Transcripts Courtesy of the NHL Communications Department

Post Game 2 comments from San Jose Sharks Head Coach Todd McLellan, Dan Boyle, Patrick Marleau, Evgeni Nabokov, Joe Thornton, and Joe Pavelski

Q.  It seemed like your team had difficulty getting out of the neutral zone tonight and settling the puck down.  What can you do about that?
COACH McLELLAN:  Well, we can — obviously, our execution has to be better.  I thought the first — up until they scored, we were doing that.  We were handling the puck well, carrying it well, coming through the neutral zone against a very good team.
Then the goal took a lot out of us for some reason.  I was disappointed because we have had that resiliency in our hockey club.  You could feel it on the bench.  It took us a while to climb back and get the energy level back up where it needed to be.
When that happens against a team that’s playing that well, you’re going have some miscues, you’re going to have some miss-execution.  I felt that we let our guard down a little bit after the first goal and they took the game over for a while.

Q.  Toews’ line had a couple more goals tonight.  You saw what they did against the Canucks.  What is the way to stop those guys right now?
COACH McLELLAN:  They had one on the power-play.  Don’t go to the penalty box.  We’re not going to be perfect in that area.  We were as good as we could be in Game 1.  They had one on the power-play.  We have to give them that one.  And then Kane on the cycle, throwing at net front with Byfuglien in there was the second one.  I thought we could have done a much better job controlling his stick.  We were up than his arm.  You’re not going to move that man.  He’s that big, that strong, he establishes his-self.  Better be able to control his stick.  We failed to do that.  Obviously, made a huge impact on the game.

Q.  You’ve had great starts in both games in the first period, but haven’t been able to capitalize.  How important is the first goal for you?
COACH McLELLAN:  Obviously, very important.  Other than the power-play goal in Game 1, we haven’t had an opportunity to play very many.  Going into their building, we saw what the first goal did to our hockey club tonight.  Took some of the energy out of the building.  Took a lot of energy out of our team.  Took us a while to get our heads up again, if you will, for lack of a better term.
If we can have that start in their building, try and quiet everything down, play with some energy early, it certainly helps.  But it’s not the be all and end all.  You have to get out there, regardless if you score the first or not, and continue on.

Q.  Joe said after the game he thought you did a pretty good job of getting away from Bolland at times.  Presumably when you go to Chicago, that will be tougher to do.  What does Joe need to do when he’s got a guy like that tasked with shutting him down specifically?
COACH McLELLAN:  If I look at Joe’s game, I thought Joe played a pretty solid game.  He was skating.  He was big.  He was strong.  I think it has to be a collective thing, because they are the centers.  We call it Joe’s line, we call it Bolland’s line, it has to be a collective five-man unit.  We’re going to have a tough time getting him away from Bolland, and that line has done a very good job.
They are some of the best players in the world.  They have to play through it.  We’re four deep or four left in the playoffs.  We’re not tinkering around in the first round anymore.  There’s some very, very good players.  Bolland’s lines happens to be one of the best checking lines in the league right now, and he has to find a way to get through it.

Q.  Just playing off of that, what do you think when you see Joe take a pretty hard whack at Bolland’s wrist before the puck even drops?  Is that a sign of frustration?
COACH McLELLAN:  When I talked to him, he was going forward on the draw.  We’ve seen that before where he times it and tries to shoot it.  It’s a tactic that Joe has.  Ended up being a little quick and ended up being on the hands.

Q.  Your goalie talked in the first two series you did a pretty good job of working with the guys, when the opponents planted somebody in front of net, you were able to play through that.  That wasn’t the case tonight.  Does that have you rethinking approaches?
COACH McLELLAN:  We’ll spend some time.  We have two days here now to look at that.  We’ll look at the video.  We’ll certainly sit with our defensive group and our goaltenders and make sure that we’re still approaching it properly.
When we do, and we execute what we plan to do, it tends to work.  But obviously tonight they got the better of us in that area.

Q.  How important is Game 3 now?  Obviously being down 0-2, is it a must-win game for your team?
COACH McLELLAN:  It’s not a must-win until you’re down 0-3.  It’s an important game.  It’s one of seven that you play in a series.  It’s very important.  But to answer your question, no, it’s not a must-win.  But we’re going to approach it like it is.

Q.  Some of the play tonight, does it go back to that quickness edge that you’ve talked about before that the Hawks have shown against your team?
COACH McLELLAN:  That’s a good question.  It’s interesting because early in the game, I thought we were quick.  We had some jump to loose pucks.  We were playing the game that we wanted to play.  It turned on us.  That’s happened two games in a row.
Somehow we have to harness what we start with and continue on.  We can’t let little bumps in the road slow us down.  I’m not sure it’s about skating any faster.  It’s the puck movement.  We don’t continue to do what we started to do.  We try and force it a little bit more.  All of a sudden we look slower.
I’m not sure if I answered your question the way you wanted me to, but that’s how I feel.

Q.  This is a chance for your veteran players to respond.  What do you expect from them?
COACH McLELLAN:  I expect them to respond.  It’s as simple as that.  We’ve worked hard to get to where we are.  We’ve had to overcome a lot.  We’re in a situation where we have to do it again.
I think throughout this playoff we’ve built character.  This gives us an opportunity now to add to that.  We’ve always boasted about our leadership in the locker room, the ability for guys to take others with them and lead them in the right direction.  We’ll need that now.

Comments from Dan Boyle

DAN BOYLE:  Both teams’ shots were down.  They scored.  We didn’t.  They had some surges.  They scored, we didn’t.
Not good enough.

Q.  Now on the road, down a couple games?
DAN BOYLE:  Everybody thinks we’re done.  Nothing would make me happier to come back and disappoint everybody because everybody thinks were done.
I’m certainly not going to quit.  I know the guys around here aren’t going to quit.  Playing the way we have hasn’t been bad, but, again, it’s not good enough.

Q.  Maybe the result isn’t good enough?
DAN BOYLE:  I’m repeating myself.  We’re working hard, but we’re not working hard enough.
Yeah, I don’t know.  I got to watch film.  Obviously as a man, we got to look in the mirror.  Pretty sure that we can — we’ll all see the game needs to be elevated.  This is a very good hockey team.

Comments from Patrick Marleau

PATRICK MARLEAU:  It comes down to what we’re doing as a line.  We’re getting the puck in deep, using our bodies, taking the puck to the net.  It’s hard for teams to defend against us.  We probably didn’t do enough of that tonight.  When we do get it in there, we have our chances.  I definitely like the next two games if it’s going to be the same.
But, you know, we know we got an uphill battle right now.  It’s a good challenge for our club, great opportunity to come back.

Comments from Evgeni Nabokov

Q.Talk about your performance tonight.
EVGENI NABOKOV:  Well, obviously it’s not good enough.  Got to be better in every area in order to win.

Q.  2004 all over again?

EVGENI NABOKOV:  Yeah, I guess you can compare that in terms of going down 2-0.  But it’s a different team.  I don’t think so, again, you can put the parallels anyhow. You know, it’s a big challenge for us, so we got to be better.  To be honest with you, we just got to find a way to win.  We have to win more battles.  We have to be maybe a little bit quicker, better around the net in both ends, so…

Comments from Joe Thornton

Q.What went wrong, in your opinion?
JOE THORNTON:  Well, I didn’t think we gave them too much, to be honest with you.  I thought we played good defensive hockey.  I don’t know how many chances they got.
We were just not capitalizing on our chances.  They are with theirs.  We aren’t with ours.
When you get to this point, everybody is going to have a good goaltender.  I don’t think we underestimated him.  He’s playing good.  I don’t think we’re getting enough second chances we need to be getting.  We have to improve on that a lot.

Q.  Is it a challenge you like?
JOE THORNTON:  Sometimes I’m against Johnny, sometimes I’m against Sharp.  I’m not always against him.  It’s a battle all night.
I think we out-shot them again tonight?  Did we?  I don’t know.  We did.  So we just have to capitalize when we get our chance, that’s all.

Comments from Joe Pavelski

JOE PAVELSKI:  At times we had it going, got away from our game, had a few too many turnovers.
They play well with a lead, especially a couple goals.  We realized they weren’t going to be sitting back.  We wanted to keep forcing it, jamming it.  You know you got to lay it behind and go to work.

Q.  Talk about Game 3.
JOE PAVELSKI:  Didn’t have nearly enough guys out there.  We didn’t get the job done.  When we have won so far this season, it’s been a commitment by everybody, everybody’s showed up, and that’s what we need.